lawyer: be allowed advertise in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed advertise in india 1.00
advertise in india 0.97
be allowed advertise 0.92
advertise 0.87
advertise on night tv 0.85
advertise on late night tv 0.82
was general of india 0.78
be with tv ads considered 0.77
be expensive in usa 0.76
is expensive uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(solicitor, was general of india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(solicitor, was general of india)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(solicitor, is expensive uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(solicitor, is expensive uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lawyer, advertise in india)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(lawyer, advertise in india)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lawyer, advertise in india)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, advertise)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(lawyer, advertise)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lawyer, advertise)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, advertise in india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, advertise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(solicitor, was general of india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be allowed advertise in india)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(solicitor, is expensive uk)