lawyer: be at courtroom

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at courtroom 1.00
rule their courtroom 0.93
object in court room 0.78
present your case to court 0.77
judge 0.77
speak in court 0.77
judge defendant to be guilty 0.77
rest his case in court 0.76
be at trial 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at courtroom)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule their courtroom)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(judge, speak in court)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at trial)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(judge, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(judge, be at courtroom)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(judge, rule their courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(judge, rule their courtroom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(judge, judge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(judge, judge)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(judge, be at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(judge, be at trial)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(judge, speak in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(judge, speak in court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lawyer, be at courtroom)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court room)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court room)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court room)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(lawyer, object in court room)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lawyer, be at courtroom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(judge, be at courtroom)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(judge, rule their courtroom)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(judge, judge)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(judge, speak in court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be at courtroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(judge, be at trial)