lawyer: be in law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in law 1.00
be in law school 0.92
keep up with law 0.87
know laws 0.84
leave law firms 0.83
interpret law 0.83
call attorney at law 0.83
look up laws 0.82
be supposed dress in law firms 0.81
dress in law firms 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(marshall, be in law school)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(barrister, interpret law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(barrister, interpret law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(barrister, interpret law)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(marshall, be in law school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(marshall, be in law school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lawyer, be in law)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, keep up with law)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, leave law firms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, keep up with law)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(lawyer, leave law firms)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lawyer, leave law firms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lawyer, keep up with law)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lawyer, keep up with law)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lawyer, leave law firms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(lawyer, be in law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(barrister, interpret law)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marshall, be in law school)