lawyer: be involve in trial

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be involve in trial 1.00
be at trial 0.88
be defined as accuse in trial 0.83
hear murder trial 0.81
be used to represent you in court 0.77
present your case to court 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(judge, hear murder trial)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(judge, be at trial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(judge, be at trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(judge, be at trial)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(judge, hear murder trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(judge, hear murder trial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to represent you in court)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lawyer, be used to represent you in court)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to represent you in court)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be used to represent you in court)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(judge, be at trial)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(judge, hear murder trial)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lawyer, be involve in trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(defendant, be defined as accuse in trial)