lawyer: be used to prosecute crime

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to prosecute crime 1.00
prosecute criminal 0.96
has great power over convict criminal 0.81
be criminal 0.80
fine convict criminal 0.79
decide criminal sentence 0.77
sentence criminal 0.76
be responsible for sentence convict 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(defendant, be criminal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(defendant, be criminal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(defendant, be criminal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(judge, sentence criminal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(judge, decide criminal sentence)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(defendant, be criminal)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, fine convict criminal)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(judge, decide criminal sentence)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(judge, decide criminal sentence)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(judge, sentence criminal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(judge, sentence criminal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lawyer, prosecute criminal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prosecute criminal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prosecute criminal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lawyer, prosecute criminal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(defendant, be criminal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, fine convict criminal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, decide criminal sentence)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(judge, has great power over convict criminal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(judge, sentence criminal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(lawyer, be used to prosecute crime)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(defendant, be criminal)