lawyer: be used to sue person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to sue person 1.00
settle legal case 0.77
settle suit 0.76
be pay to know about law 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(judge, settle suit)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(judge, settle legal case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(judge, settle legal case)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(judge, settle legal case)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(judge, settle suit)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(judge, settle suit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lawyer, be used to sue person)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to sue person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(judge, settle suit)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(judge, settle legal case)