lawyer: object in court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
object in court 1.00
prefer court 0.83
remove to court 0.81
prefer federal court 0.81
lie in court 0.80
sit in court 0.79
remove to federal court 0.79
prefer out of court settlements 0.77
represent criminals in court 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(defendant, remove to court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(defendant, remove to court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(defendant, remove to court)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(defendant, remove to federal court)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer court)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, sit in court)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(defendant, remove to court)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object in court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(solicitor, sit in court)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(solicitor, sit in court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lawyer, object in court)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, lie in court)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lawyer, lie in court)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, lie in court)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(lawyer, lie in court)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, object in court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to court)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(solicitor, sit in court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to court)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, object in court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)