lawyer: object to hearsay

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
object to hearsay 1.00
object to heresay 0.87
object to evidence 0.78
rule that something be inadmissable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule that something be inadmissable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(judge, rule that something be inadmissable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(judge, rule that something be inadmissable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to hearsay)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to heresay)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to evidence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to hearsay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(judge, rule that something be inadmissable)