lawyer: object to heresay

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
object to heresay 1.00
object to hearsay 0.87
object to evidence 0.79
object to question 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to hearsay)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to hearsay)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to hearsay)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to hearsay)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to heresay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(lawyer, object to heresay)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to heresay)