lawyer: object to line of question

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
object to line of question 1.00
object to question 0.95
answer that question 0.84
answer question 0.84
answer lot of question 0.83
question suspect 0.81
object to man behaviour 0.79
question witness 0.78
answer tough question 0.78
object to evidence 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer tough question)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(investigator, question suspect)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expert, answer that question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(expert, answer question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(expert, answer tough question)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(investigator, question suspect)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(investigator, question suspect)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(judge, object to man behaviour)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(judge, object to man behaviour)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(judge, question witness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to question)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lawyer, question witness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to evidence)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to evidence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(judge, object to man behaviour)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(judge, question witness)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(investigator, question suspect)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, answer question)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(expert, answer tough question)