lawyer: owe duty to court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
owe duty to court 1.00
be exempt from jury duty 0.82
be excluded from jury duty 0.79
owed plaintiff money 0.77
prefer court 0.76
prefer federal court 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defendant, owed plaintiff money)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(defendant, owed plaintiff money)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(defendant, owed plaintiff money)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer court)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(defendant, owed plaintiff money)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lawyer, owe duty to court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, owed plaintiff money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(lawyer, owe duty to court)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, owed plaintiff money)