lawyer: prepare briefs for court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
prepare briefs for court 1.00
be called briefs 0.93
prepare for trial 0.78
prefer court 0.76
prefer federal court 0.76
sit in court 0.76
wear wigs in court 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer court)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, be called briefs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, sit in court)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(barrister, be called briefs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(barrister, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(barrister, be called briefs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(solicitor, be called briefs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(solicitor, be called briefs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(barrister, wear wigs in court)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(solicitor, sit in court)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(solicitor, sit in court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear wigs in court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare for trial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(barrister, be called briefs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(barrister, wear wigs in court)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(solicitor, sit in court)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(solicitor, be called briefs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(lawyer, prepare briefs for court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)