lawyer: present case

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
present case 1.00
present your case to court 0.91
prove case 0.84
be used to decide case 0.84
state case 0.83
prove their case 0.83
try case 0.83
be close case 0.82
rule over case 0.79
rest his case 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, be close case)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule over case)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(judge, be used to decide case)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judge, be close case)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, be close case)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(judge, rule over case)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(judge, rule over case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, present case)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lawyer, state case)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lawyer, state case)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove their case)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove case)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lawyer, try case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove their case)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, try case)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove case)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove case)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lawyer, try case)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove their case)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, state case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(judge, be used to decide case)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(judge, rule over case)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(judge, be close case)