lawyer: prove that person be guilty

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
prove that person be guilty 1.00
consider whether person be guilty 0.90
fine person find guilty 0.89
has defend probably quilty person 0.86
judge defendant to be guilty 0.84
prove case 0.84
prove their case 0.83
prove to judge 0.83
prove his client innocent 0.82
be responsible for sentence convict 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(judge, consider whether person be guilty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(judge, fine person find guilty)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(judge, consider whether person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(judge, consider whether person be guilty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove case)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove their case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lawyer, has defend probably quilty person)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove his client innocent)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove case)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove to judge)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove case)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove their case)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove case)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove their case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(judge, judge defendant to be guilty)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(judge, fine person find guilty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(judge, be responsible for sentence convict)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove that person be guilty)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(judge, consider whether person be guilty)