lawyer: question witness

Related concepts

Parents	activist Weight: 0.71 , expert Weight: 0.69 , specialist Weight: 0.66 , defendant Weight: 0.66
Siblings	investigator Weight: 0.65 , solicitor Weight: 0.58 , arbitrator Weight: 0.54 , fisher Weight: 0.54 , judge Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
question witness	1.00
require testimony from witness	0.85
subject witness to examination	0.85
question suspect	0.82
answer question	0.81
answer that question	0.81
object to question	0.81
answer lot of question	0.80
object to line of question	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expert, answer lot of question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(expert, answer that question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(expert, answer question)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(expert, answer that question)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(expert, answer question)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(expert, answer that question)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(judge, require testimony from witness)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(investigator, question suspect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(expert, answer that question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(expert, answer lot of question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(expert, answer question) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(judge, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(judge, question witness)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(investigator, question suspect) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(investigator, question suspect)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(judge, require testimony from witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(judge, require testimony from witness)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(lawyer, question witness)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(lawyer, object to question)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(lawyer, object to line of question)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(lawyer, object to question)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(lawyer, object to line of question)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to question)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, object to line of question)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to line of question)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(lawyer, object to question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(expert, answer question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(judge, question witness)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(judge, require testimony from witness)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(investigator, question suspect)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(expert, answer that question)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(lawyer, question witness) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(expert, answer question)