lawyer: represent criminals in court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
represent criminals in court 1.00
represent criminals 0.94
defend criminals 0.88
represent murderers 0.87
protect criminals 0.86
defend murderers 0.81
help murderers 0.79
lie in court 0.79
ever defend mass murderers 0.79
defend obvious murderers 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, represent murderers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lawyer, represent murderers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(lawyer, represent murderers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lawyer, represent murderers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(lawyer, lie in court)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lawyer, defend murderers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, lie in court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(lawyer, lie in court)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, lie in court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, represent criminals in court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(lawyer, represent criminals in court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, represent criminals in court)