lawyer: state case

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
state case 1.00
present your case to court 0.84
present case 0.83
try case 0.83
be used to decide case 0.82
be close case 0.82
rest his case in court 0.82
rule over case 0.82
rest her case 0.80
rest his case 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, be close case)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule over case)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judge, be close case)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, be close case)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(judge, be used to decide case)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(judge, rule over case)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(judge, rule over case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lawyer, state case)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, try case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest her case)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest her case)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest her case)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest her case)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lawyer, try case)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, present case)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lawyer, try case)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present case)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, state case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(judge, be used to decide case)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(judge, rule over case)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(judge, be close case)