lawyer: subject witness to examination

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
subject witness to examination 1.00
require testimony from witness 0.85
question witness 0.85
require testimony 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(judge, question witness)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(judge, require testimony)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(judge, question witness)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(judge, question witness)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judge, require testimony from witness)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(judge, require testimony)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(judge, require testimony)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lawyer, question witness)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(lawyer, question witness)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lawyer, question witness)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, question witness)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lawyer, subject witness to examination)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, require testimony from witness)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(judge, question witness)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, subject witness to examination)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, require testimony)