lawyer: try case

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
try case 1.00
be used to decide case 0.87
present your case to court 0.83
prove their case 0.83
present case 0.83
state case 0.83
be close case 0.82
prove case 0.82
rest his case 0.81
rest his case in court 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(judge, be close case)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(judge, be used to decide case)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(judge, be close case)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(judge, be close case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lawyer, try case)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove their case)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(lawyer, state case)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lawyer, state case)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lawyer, prove case)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, state case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, present case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove their case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, prove case)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove their case)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prove case)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lawyer, rest his case)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present case)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove case)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prove their case)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lawyer, state case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lawyer, try case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(judge, be used to decide case)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, try case)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(judge, be close case)