lawyer: tweet about trial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
tweet about trial 1.00
go to trial 0.82
use twitter 0.79
use twitter find 0.77
prepare for trial 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(defendant, go to trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, tweet about trial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(defendant, go to trial)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defendant, go to trial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(defendant, go to trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, tweet about trial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lawyer, tweet about trial)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lawyer, prepare for trial)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, prepare for trial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, tweet about trial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, tweet about trial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(defendant, go to trial)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(lawyer, tweet about trial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(defendant, go to trial)