lawyer: wear gowns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear gowns 1.00
wear black gowns 0.98
dress in coats 0.88
dress in black coats 0.86
wear clothes 0.86
wear robes 0.85
wear black clothes 0.85
wear coats 0.85
wear white wigs 0.85
wear black robes 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear gowns)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear black gowns)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear white wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear robes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(barrister, wear black robes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(barrister, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear gowns)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(barrister, wear robes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear robes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(barrister, wear black gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear black gowns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(barrister, wear white wigs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear white wigs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(barrister, wear black robes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(barrister, wear black robes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear gowns)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black gowns)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black gowns)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black gowns)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear black gowns)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear black clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear gowns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(barrister, wear gowns)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(barrister, wear black gowns)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(barrister, wear robes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(barrister, wear white wigs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear gowns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(barrister, wear black robes)