laziness: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
be good 0.82
has quality evil 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
feel good 0.76
has quality sin 0.76
be considered bad thing 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sin, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sin, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality sin)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(virtue, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(virtue, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality wrong)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(virtue, be good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(virtue, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sin, has quality sin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be good for us)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(gluttony, has quality sin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(sin, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(virtue, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sin, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(virtue, be good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(sin, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boredom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boredom, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(boredom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(boredom, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(boredom, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boredom, be good for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(gluttony, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(gluttony, has quality sin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(selfishness, has quality sin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(laziness, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(laziness, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(laziness, is bad thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(laziness, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(laziness, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(laziness, feel good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality sin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality sin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(laziness, is bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(laziness, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(laziness, has quality sin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(laziness, has quality sin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(laziness, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(boredom, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(gluttony, has quality sin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality sin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boredom, be good for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(selfishness, be considered bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality wrong)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(selfishness, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dishonesty, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(boredom, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sin, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sin, has quality sin)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(virtue, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(virtue, be good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(laziness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sin, has quality wrong)