laziness: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be most problematic state of being 0.79
has state dislike 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sin, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sin, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(factor, has state dislike)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sin, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(factor, has state dislike)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(sin, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(factor, has state dislike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boredom, be most problematic state of being) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(laziness, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sin, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sin, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(factor, has state dislike)