laziness: is human trait

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.66
, reason
Weight: 0.66
, sin
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings selfishness
Weight: 0.37
, gluttony
Weight: 0.35
, ignorance
Weight: 0.35
, boredom
Weight: 0.35
, dishonesty
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is human trait 1.00
has trait trait 0.93
be considered personality trait 0.86
be considered bad personality trait 0.86
is human 0.85
has trait fun 0.85
is evolved trait 0.84
be part of human psychology 0.79
be related to human evolution 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sin, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sin, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sin, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sin, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human trait)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boredom, be part of human psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(laziness, is human trait)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has trait trait)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, has trait trait)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is human)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(laziness, be considered personality trait)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(laziness, has trait trait)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(laziness, is human)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(laziness, has trait trait)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be considered bad personality trait)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(laziness, is evolved trait)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(laziness, is human)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(laziness, be related to human evolution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(laziness, be related to human evolution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(laziness, is human trait)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sin, has trait fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boredom, be part of human psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(laziness, is human trait) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sin, has trait fun)