lcd: monitors work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.60
, electronic device
Weight: 0.59
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
Siblings tablet computer
Weight: 0.35
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, pda
Weight: 0.35
, vcr
Weight: 0.34
, motherboard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
monitors work 1.00
is monitors 0.98
be better for computer monitors 0.92
be better than plasma monitors 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lcd, monitors work)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(lcd, be better for computer monitors)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(lcd, be better for computer monitors)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lcd, be better than plasma monitors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lcd, is monitors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lcd, is monitors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lcd, be better than plasma monitors)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lcd, is monitors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lcd, is monitors)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lcd, be better for computer monitors)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lcd, be better than plasma monitors)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lcd, be better for computer monitors)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lcd, be better than plasma monitors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lcd, monitors work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lcd, monitors work)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lcd, monitors work)