le: has state rank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.54
, advantage
Weight: 0.48
, condition
Weight: 0.47
, event
Weight: 0.46
Siblings de
Weight: 0.32
, mardi gras
Weight: 0.32
, les
Weight: 0.32
, tour de france
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state rank 1.00
is toxic rank 0.86
be in ranked 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(le, has state rank)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(le, is toxic rank)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(le, is toxic rank)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(le, is toxic rank)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(le, is toxic rank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(le, has state rank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(le, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(le, has state rank)