leader: arm population

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.59
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66
, head
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
arm population 1.00
control population 0.88
govern population 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(politician, govern population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(politician, govern population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(politician, govern population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(leader, arm population)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(leader, control population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(leader, control population)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(leader, control population)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(leader, control population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(leader, arm population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(leader, arm population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(leader, arm population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(politician, govern population)