leader: be selected in swaziland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, position
Weight: 0.63
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.70
, leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be selected in swaziland 1.00
be selected in guatemala 1.00
be selected in botswana 1.00
be selected 1.00
were selected 0.97
be chosen in angola 0.93
be chosen in honduras 0.93
be chosen 0.93
is chosen 0.92
be selected in states 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prime minister, is chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(prime minister, is chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(prime minister, is chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(leader, be selected)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in guatemala)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(leader, is chosen)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in botswana)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in guatemala)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in guatemala)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(leader, is chosen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in guatemala)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(leader, be selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in botswana)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in botswana)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(leader, is chosen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in botswana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(leader, is chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in swaziland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in swaziland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(prime minister, is chosen)