leader: chair meet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
, character
Weight: 0.59
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66
, head
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
chair meet 1.00
chair committee 0.85
chair panel 0.82
chair discussion 0.82
be at meet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leader, chair meet)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(manager, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leader, chair meet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(manager, chair meet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(manager, be at meet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manager, chair meet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at meet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(politician, chair discussion)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(manager, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leader, chair meet)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(manager, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leader, chair meet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(politician, chair discussion)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(politician, chair discussion)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(leader, chair meet)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(leader, chair committee)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair panel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(leader, chair panel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(leader, chair panel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(leader, chair panel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair committee)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leader, chair committee)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(leader, chair committee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(leader, chair meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(manager, chair meet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(manager, be at meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(politician, chair discussion)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(manager, chair meet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(leader, chair meet)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(manager, be at meet)