leader: were chosen in ancient egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, position
Weight: 0.63
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.70
, leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
were chosen in ancient egypt 1.00
were chosen in egypt 0.93
were chosen in rome 0.84
be chosen in saudi arabia 0.82
be chosen in colombia 0.79
be selected in britain 0.79
be chosen in cuba 0.79
be chosen in japan 0.79
be selected in great britain 0.78
were chosen in west africa 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in rome)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in rome)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(leader, were chosen in rome)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in cuba)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in cuba)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in west africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in west africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in great britain)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in great britain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in cuba)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in japan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leader, were chosen in west africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in great britain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in rome)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in japan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in cuba)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in great britain)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in west africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient egypt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)