leader: were chosen in ancient mesopotamia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, position
Weight: 0.63
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.70
, leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
were chosen in ancient mesopotamia 1.00
were ancient chosen 1.00
were chosen in mesopotamia 0.87
were chosen 0.86
were chosen by iroquois 0.85
be chosen in angola 0.84
be chosen in honduras 0.84
was chosen 0.82
be chosen 0.82
is chosen 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prime minister, is chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(prime minister, is chosen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(prime minister, is chosen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(leader, is chosen)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(leader, is chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(leader, is chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in honduras)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in angola)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(leader, is chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, were chosen in ancient mesopotamia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(prime minister, is chosen)