leadership: affect production

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect production 1.00
affect lean production 0.89
factor of production 0.87
be considered factor of production 0.85
be related to output 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ability, factor of production)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, affect production)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ability, be considered factor of production)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, affect production)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ability, be considered factor of production)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ability, factor of production)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ability, be considered factor of production)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ability, factor of production)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be related to output)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ability, factor of production)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(leadership, affect production)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ability, be considered factor of production)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(leadership, affect production)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(speaker, be related to output)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(speaker, be related to output)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(leadership, affect production)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect lean production)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(leadership, affect lean production)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(leadership, affect lean production)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(leadership, affect lean production)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, affect production)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ability, be considered factor of production)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ability, factor of production)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(speaker, be related to output)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ability, be considered factor of production)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, affect production)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ability, factor of production)