leadership: be bad days

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad days 1.00
go bad 0.82
seem bad people 0.78
be good for people 0.77
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(leadership, be bad days)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(role, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(role, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(leadership, be bad days)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(leadership, be bad days)

Similarity expansion

0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(leadership, be good for people)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(leadership, be good for people)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(leadership, be good for people)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good for people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be bad days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(leadership, be bad days)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(leadership, be bad days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)