leadership: be good skill have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good skill have 1.00
is skill 0.96
is important skill 0.96
need skills 0.87
need good communication skills 0.85
need communication skills 0.82
communication fit should possess in in qualities 0.79
has quality good 0.79
need human relations skills 0.77
need relations skills 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, be good skill have)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mentor, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(mentor, need good communication skills)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mentor, need communication skills)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leadership, be good skill have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(mentor, need good communication skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mentor, need good communication skills)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(mentor, need communication skills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(mentor, need communication skills)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mentor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mentor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(leadership, be good skill have)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(leadership, is skill)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is important skill)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is skill)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(leadership, is skill)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(leadership, is skill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(leadership, is important skill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(leadership, is important skill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(leadership, is important skill)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(leadership, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, be good skill have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mentor, need communication skills)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mentor, need good communication skills)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mentor, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(leadership, be good skill have) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(leader, communication fit should possess in in qualities)