leadership: be important coaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important coaching 1.00
be important in team 0.77
play teaching strategy 0.76
play effective teaching strategy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(role, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(role, play effective teaching strategy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(role, play teaching strategy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leadership, be important coaching)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(role, play teaching strategy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(role, be important in team)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(role, play teaching strategy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(role, be important in team)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(role, be important in team)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(role, play effective teaching strategy)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(role, play teaching strategy)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(leadership, be important coaching)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(leadership, be important in team)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(leadership, be important in team)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important in team)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important in team)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(leadership, be important coaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(role, play teaching strategy)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(role, be important in team)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(role, play teaching strategy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(role, play effective teaching strategy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(leadership, be important coaching)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(role, be important in team)