leadership: be important improving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important improving 1.00
has quality good 0.76
is work important 0.75
be important today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mentor, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mentor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mentor, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(leadership, be important improving)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(leadership, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(leadership, be important today)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(leadership, be important today)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important today)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important today)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important improving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leadership, be important improving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important improving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mentor, has quality good)