leadership: be more important than management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than management 1.00
be different from management 0.88
is more important 0.87
be key issue in management 0.84
relate to management 0.83
be better than experience 0.80
be important for project managers 0.78
be important for business 0.78
be important in business 0.77
be more defined now 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(role, is more important)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ability, be better than experience)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ability, be better than experience)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(role, be more defined now)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(role, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ability, be better than experience)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(role, be more defined now)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(role, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mentor, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(role, is more important)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(ability, be better than experience)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(role, be more defined now)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mentor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mentor, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(leadership, be more important than management)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be different from management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(leadership, be different from management)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, relate to management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important for project managers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important for business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important in business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(leadership, be different from management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(leadership, relate to management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(leadership, relate to management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(leadership, relate to management)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(leadership, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(leadership, be important for project managers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(leadership, be important for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(leadership, be different from management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important in business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important for project managers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leadership, be important in business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(leadership, be important for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leadership, be important for project managers)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leadership, be key issue in management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ability, be better than experience)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(role, be more defined now)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(role, is more important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mentor, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ability, be better than experience)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(role, be more defined now)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(role, is more important)