leadership: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality right 0.90
has quality price 0.80
be good for people 0.79
be good skill have 0.79
has quality resource 0.79
sound good 0.78
be important improving 0.76
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ability, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(role, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ability, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(role, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ability, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(speaker, has quality right)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mentor, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(religious leader, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(ability, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(leadership, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(mentor, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mentor, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(speaker, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(speaker, has quality right)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(religious leader, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(religious leader, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(leadership, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(leadership, be good skill have)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good for people)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be important improving)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be good skill have)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(leadership, be good skill have)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(leadership, be good skill have)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(leadership, be good for people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(leadership, be important improving)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(leadership, be good for people)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(leadership, be good for people)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(leadership, be important improving)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(leadership, be important improving)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(leadership, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ability, has quality resource)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(religious leader, has quality definition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(mentor, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(speaker, has quality right)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ability, has quality resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(leadership, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)