leadership: relate to management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to management 1.00
be different from management 0.87
be more important than management 0.83
be key issue in management 0.80
relate to examples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(role, relate to examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(leadership, relate to management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(role, relate to examples)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(role, relate to examples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(role, relate to examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(leadership, relate to management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(leadership, relate to management)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be different from management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(leadership, be different from management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be more important than management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(leadership, be more important than management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(leadership, be different from management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(leadership, be more important than management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(leadership, be more important than management)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(leadership, be different from management)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(leadership, be key issue in management)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leadership, be key issue in management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, relate to management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(leadership, relate to management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(role, relate to examples)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(leadership, relate to management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(role, relate to examples)