leap: be in logic dealt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents year
Weight: 0.52
, step
Weight: 0.51
, jump
Weight: 0.49
, program
Weight: 0.47
, move
Weight: 0.46
Siblings jumping
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, change
Weight: 0.30
, transition
Weight: 0.29
, fiscal year
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in logic dealt 1.00
be in logic 0.87
be in logic dealt with at seminaries 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(leap, be in logic dealt)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leap, be in logic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(leap, be in logic dealt with at seminaries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(leap, be in logic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(leap, be in logic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(leap, be in logic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(leap, be in logic dealt with at seminaries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(leap, be in logic dealt with at seminaries)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(leap, be in logic dealt with at seminaries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(leap, be in logic dealt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(leap, be in logic dealt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(leap, be in logic dealt)