learning: be useful in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, training
Weight: 0.58
Siblings understanding
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, computer game
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32
, vocabulary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in business 1.00
is useful 0.89
is valuable 0.79
is beneficial 0.78
is beneficial nowadays 0.77
be important for need 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(vocabulary, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(understanding, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(understanding, is beneficial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(understanding, is useful)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(understanding, is useful)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(vocabulary, is useful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(vocabulary, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(understanding, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(understanding, is beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(learning, be useful in business)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(learning, is beneficial)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(learning, is beneficial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(learning, is beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(learning, is valuable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(learning, is valuable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(learning, is valuable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(learning, is valuable)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(learning, is beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(learning, be useful in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(understanding, is useful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(understanding, is beneficial)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(learning, be useful in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(vocabulary, is useful)