learning: be waste of time

Related concepts

Parents	challenge Weight: 0.62 , field Weight: 0.61 , element Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59 , training Weight: 0.58
Siblings	understanding Weight: 0.33 , football field Weight: 0.32 , computer game Weight: 0.32 , motivation Weight: 0.32 , vocabulary Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be waste of time	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(computer game, be waste of time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(computer game, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(computer game, be waste of time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(learning, be waste of time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(learning, be waste of time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(learning, be waste of time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(learning, be waste of time) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(computer game, be waste of time)