learning: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, training
Weight: 0.58
Siblings understanding
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, computer game
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32
, vocabulary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be painful process 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(motivation, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(motivation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(motivation, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(learning, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(learning, be painful process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(learning, be painful process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(learning, be painful process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(learning, be painful process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(learning, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(learning, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(learning, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(motivation, has physical part process)