learning: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, training
Weight: 0.58
Siblings understanding
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, computer game
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32
, vocabulary
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality class 0.82
feel good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(vocabulary, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(understanding, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(motivation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(learning, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(learning, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(training, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(learning, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(motivation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(motivation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(understanding, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(understanding, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(vocabulary, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(vocabulary, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(learning, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(learning, has quality better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(learning, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(learning, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(learning, has quality class)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(learning, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(learning, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(learning, has quality class)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(learning, has quality class)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality class)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(learning, feel good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(learning, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(learning, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(motivation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(understanding, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(vocabulary, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(learning, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)