lease: be cheaper than finance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, financing
Weight: 0.61
, transfer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.34
, deal
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.32
, income tax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than finance 1.00
is cheaper 0.85
be much higher than investment tax 0.81
is more expensive 0.81
be much higher than sales tax 0.79
be more relevant than fixed costs 0.79
is expensive now 0.78
be more relevant than costs 0.78
be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making 0.77
be more relevant than fixed costs in decision making 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lease, be cheaper than finance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(deal, is more expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(deal, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(deal, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(lease, be cheaper than finance)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(lease, is cheaper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lease, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lease, is cheaper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lease, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lease, be cheaper than finance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than sales tax)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(income tax, be much higher than investment tax)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(deal, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(lease, be cheaper than finance)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)