lease: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, financing
Weight: 0.61
, transfer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.34
, deal
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.32
, income tax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
was good 0.81
has quality price 0.78
is bad deal 0.78
has quality function 0.76
be with bad team composition 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(financing, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(financing, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grant, was good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(deal, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(deal, is bad deal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(financing, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(deal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(deal, is bad deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(deal, is bad deal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lease, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lease, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(deal, is bad deal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(lease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)