lease: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, financing
Weight: 0.61
, transfer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.34
, deal
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.32
, income tax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality price 0.79
has quality function 0.78
be in best way 0.77
was good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(financing, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(transfer, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grant, was good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(transfer, has quality price)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(deal, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deal, be in best way)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(transfer, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grant, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(deal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deal, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(bridge loan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bridge loan, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(deal, be in best way) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(deal, be in best way)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lease, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lease, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deal, be in best way)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bridge loan, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(transfer, has quality price)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(lease, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grant, was good)