lease: have reputation in general

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contract
Weight: 0.67
, grant
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.63
, financing
Weight: 0.61
, transfer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.34
, deal
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.32
, bridge loan
Weight: 0.32
, income tax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have reputation in general 1.00
was good general 0.78
was general 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was good general)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(lease, have reputation in general)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was general)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(lease, have reputation in general)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grant, was good general)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grant, was general)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(grant, was good general)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(grant, was general)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was good general)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(grant, was general)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(lease, have reputation in general)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(lease, have reputation in general)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(grant, was general)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(grant, was good general)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(grant, was general)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(lease, have reputation in general)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(grant, was good general)