lecture: be for clients

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents presentation
Weight: 0.69
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, discussion
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
Siblings seminar
Weight: 0.35
, recital
Weight: 0.34
, speaker
Weight: 0.34
, concert
Weight: 0.34
, forum
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for clients 1.00
be for bariatric clients 0.80
be important in customer service 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lecture, be for clients)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(presentation, be important in customer service)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(presentation, be important in customer service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lecture, be for clients)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lecture, be for clients)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lecture, be for bariatric clients)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lecture, be for bariatric clients)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lecture, be for bariatric clients)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lecture, be for bariatric clients)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lecture, be for clients)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lecture, be for clients)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(lecture, be for clients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(presentation, be important in customer service)