led: be better than cfls

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
, part
Weight: 0.56
, light source
Weight: 0.53
, lamp
Weight: 0.53
Siblings trigger
Weight: 0.30
, stem
Weight: 0.30
, ending
Weight: 0.30
, third
Weight: 0.30
, in
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cfls 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be brighter than others 0.84
have one leg bigger than another 0.79
has state less 0.79
is more expensive 0.78
is brighter 0.76
use less energy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(led, be better than cfls)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(led, be better than cfls)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(led, be better than cfls)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(led, use less energy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(led, has state less)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(led, have one leg bigger than another)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(led, use less energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(led, use less energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(led, use less energy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(led, has state less)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(led, have one leg bigger than another)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(led, has state less)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(led, have one leg bigger than another)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(led, has state less)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(led, have one leg bigger than another)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(led, be better than cfls)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(led, be better than cfls)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)